[1] A. Bellen, Z. Jackiewicz, and M. Zennaro. Contractivity of waveform relaxation Runge-Kutta iterations and related limit methods for dissipative systems in the maximum norm. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 31:499-523, 1994. [ bib ]
[2] A. Bellen and L. Torelli. Unconditional contractivity in the maximum norm of diagonally split Runge-Kutta methods. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 34:528-543, 1997. [ bib ]
[3] L Ferracina and MN Spijker. Stepsize restrictions for total-variation-boundedness in general runge-kutta procedures. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 53:265-279, 2005. [ bib | DOI ]
[4] L. Ferracina and M. N. Spijker. An extension and analysis of the Shu-Osher representation of Runge-Kutta methods. Mathematics of Computation, 249:201-219, 2005. [ bib ]
[5] L. Ferracina and M. N. Spijker. Computing optimal monotonicity-preserving Runge-Kutta methods. Technical Report MI2005-07, Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, 2005. [ bib ]
[6] L. Ferracina and M. N. Spijker. Stepsize restrictions for the total-variation-diminishing property in general Runge-Kutta methods. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 42:1073-1093, 2004. [ bib ]
[7] Luca Ferracina. Monotonicity and boundedness in general Runge-Kutta methods. PhD thesis, University of Leiden, 2005. [ bib ]
[8] Luca Ferracina and Marc Spjker. Strong stability of singly-diagonally-implicit Runge-Kutta methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 2008. to appear. [ bib ]
[9] Sigal Gottlieb. On high order strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta and multi step time discretizations. Journal of Scientific Computing, 25:105-127, 2005. [ bib ]
[10] Sigal Gottlieb and Steven J. Ruuth. Optimal strong-stability-preserving time-stepping schemes with fast downwind spatial discretizations. Journal of Scientific Computing, 27:289-303, 2006. [ bib ]
[11] Sigal Gottlieb, Chi-Wang Shu, and Eitan Tadmor. Strong stability preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Review, 43:89-112, 2001. [ bib ]
[12] Sigal Gottlieb and Lee-Ad J. Gottlieb. Strong stability preserving properties of Runge-Kutta time discretization methods for linear constant coefficient operators. Journal of Scientific Computing, 18:83-109, 2003. [ bib ]
[13] Sigal Gottlieb and Chi-Wang Shu. Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes. Mathematics of Computation, 67:73-85, 1998. [ bib ]
[14] J. A. van de Griend and J. F. B. M. Kraaijevanger. Absolute monotonicity of rational functions occurring in the numerical solution of initial value problems. Numerische Mathematik, 49:413-424, 1986. [ bib ]
[15] E. Hairer. Highest possible order of algebraically stable diagonally implicit Runge-Kutta methods. BIT, 20:254-256, 1980. [ bib ]
[16] I Higueras. On strong stability preserving time discretization methods. Journal of Scientific Computing, 21:193-223, 2004. [ bib ]
[17] I Higueras. Representations of Runge-Kutta methods and strong stability preserving methods. Siam Journal On Numerical Analysis, 43:924-948, 2005. [ bib | DOI ]
[18] Inmaculada Higueras. Strong stability for additive Runge-Kutta methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 44:1735-1758, 2006. [ bib ]
[19] Zoltan Horvath. On the positivity step size threshold of Runge-Kutta methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 53:341-356, 2005. [ bib ]
[20] Zoltan Horvath. Positivity of Runge-Kutta and diagonally split Runge-Kutta methods. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 28:309-326, 1998. [ bib ]
[21] KJI Hout. A note on unconditional maximum norm contractivity of diagonally split runge-kutta methods. Siam Journal On Numerical Analysis, 33:1125-1134, 1996. [ bib ]
[22] Willem Hundsdorfer and Steven J. Ruuth. Imex extensions of linear multistep methods with general monotonicity and boundedness properties. Journal of Computational Physics, 225:201-2042, 2007. [ bib ]
[23] Willem Hundsdorfer, Steven J. Ruuth, and Raymond J. Spiteri. Monotonicity-preserving linear multistep methods. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 41:605-623, 2003. [ bib ]
[24] Willem Hundsdorfer and Steven J. Ruuth. On monotonicity and boundedness properties of linear multistep methods. Mathematics of Computation, 75(254):655-672, 2005. [ bib ]
[25] Christopher A. Kennedy, Mark H. Carpenter, and R. Michael Lewis. Low-storage, explicit Runge-Kutta schemes for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 35:177-219, 2000. [ bib ]
[26] David I. Ketcheson. An algebraic characterization of strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta schemes. Master's thesis, Brigham Young University, 2004. B.Sc. Thesis. [ bib ]
[27] David I. Ketcheson. Highly efficient strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta methods with low-storage implementations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2008. to appear. [ bib ]
[28] David I. Ketcheson and Allen C. Robinson. On the practical importance of the SSP property for Runge-Kutta time integrators for some common Godunov-type schemes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 48:271-303, 2005. [ bib ]
[29] David I. Ketcheson, Colin B. Macdonald, and Sigal Gottlieb. Optimal implicit strong stability preserving Runge-Kutta methods. 2007. in preparation. [ bib ]
[30] J. F. B. M. Kraaijevanger. Absolute monotonicity of polynomials occurring in the numerical solution of initial value problems. Numerische Mathematik, 48:303-322, 1986. [ bib ]
[31] J. F. B. M. Kraaijevanger. Contractivity of Runge-Kutta methods. BIT, 31:482-528, 1991. [ bib ]
[32] Ethan J. Kubatko, Joannes J. Westerink, and Clint Dawson. Semi discrete discontinuous Galerkin methods and stage-exceeding-order, strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta time discretizations. Journal of Computational Physics, 222:832-848, 2007. [ bib ]
[33] H W. J. Lenferink. Contractivity-preserving explicit linear multistep methods. Numerische Mathematik, 55:213-223, 1989. [ bib ]
[34] H W. J. Lenferink. Contractivity-preserving implicit linear multistep methods. Math. Comp., 56:177-199, 1991. [ bib ]
[35] Y. Liu, C.-W. Shu, and M. Zhang. Strong stability preserving property of the deferred correction time discretization. Journal of Computational Mathematics. to appear. [ bib ]
[36] Colin MacDonald, Sigal Gottlieb, and Steven Ruuth. A numerical study of diagonally split Runge-Kutta methods for PDEs with discontinuities. [ bib ]
[37] Colin B. Macdonald. Constructing high-order Runge-Kutta methods with embedded strong-stability-preserving pairs. Master's thesis, Simon Fraser University, August 2003. [ bib ]
[38] S. J. Ruuth and R. J. Spiteri. High-order strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods with downwind-biased spatial discretizations. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 42:974-996, 2004. [ bib ]
[39] Steven Ruuth. Global optimization of explicit strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods. Math. Comp., 75:183-207, 2006. [ bib ]
[40] Steven J. Ruuth and Willem Hundsdorfer. High-order linear multistep methods with general monotonicity and boundedness properties. Journal of Computational Physics, 209:226-248, 2005. [ bib ]
[41] Steven J. Ruuth and Raymond J. Spiteri. Two barriers on strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods. Journal of Scientific Computation, 17:211-220, 2002. [ bib ]
[42] C.-W. Shu and S. Osher. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 77:439-471, 1988. [ bib ]
[43] Chi-Wang Shu. A survey of strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. In Collected Lectures on the Preservation of Stability under discretization. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 2002. [ bib ]
[44] Chi-Wang Shu. Total-variation diminishing time discretizations. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp., 9:1073-1084, 1988. [ bib ]
[45] M. N. Spijker. Contractivity in the numerical solution of initial value problems. Numerische Mathematik, 42:271-290, 1983. [ bib ]
[46] M. N. Spijker. On the relation between stability and contractivity. BIT, 24:656-666, 1984. [ bib ]
[47] M. N. Spijker. Stepsize conditions for general monotonicity in numerical initial value problems. Siam Journal On Numerical Analysis, 45:1226-1245, 2007. [ bib | DOI ]
[48] M. N. Spijker. Stepsize restrictions for stability of one-step methods in the numerical solution of initial value problems. Mathematics of Computation, 45:377-392, 1985. [ bib ]
[49] Raymond J. Spiteri and Steven J. Ruuth. A new class of optimal high-order strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 40:469-491, 2002. [ bib ]
[50] Raymond J. Spiteri and Steven J. Ruuth. Nonlinear evolution using optimal fourth-order strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 62:125-135, 2003. [ bib ]
[51] Rong Wang and Raymond J. Spiteri. Linear instability of the fifth-order weno method. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 45(5):1871-1901, 2007. [ bib | DOI | http ]

This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.90.